Current matters and research archive
Decided and dated matters first; the complete research directory when you need it.
Northeast Georgia174 awaiting decisions issues
174 issuesAwaiting decisions · Priority order
Commissioners heard that the three radio-tower structures are complete and equipment is being installed, but their May work session produced no documented appointment or formal delay for the…
Commissioners sought details on fees, outreach and equipment as they reviewed an ordinance update tied to the Northeast Georgia Animal Shelter agreement.
A May work-session agenda called for discussion and approval consideration of Resolution 2026-4 without describing the proposed amendments or recording a decision.
Commissioners were scheduled to consider an agreement with the school board, but the documented record does not show whether the proposal was approved.
City officials heard a department plan that combines recent hiring, possible contractor bids and major equipment requests, but the budget meeting recorded no funding or purchasing decision.
Susan Wesson backed the county’s proposed Animal Control Ordinance at a March 31 work session while asking commissioners to make sterilization requirements explicit.
County officials reported power at the Highway 326 tower and equipment on hand for Royston, but gave no timetable for resolving the issue blocking construction there.
Commissioners discussed using a city-owned facility at 125 Ivy St. for fire operations, but the public meeting record does not show whether the agreement was approved.
Commissioners scheduled an Aug. 17 hearing on Mitchell Payne’s request to use a 5.58-acre Low Intensity parcel for go-kart and remote-control-car racing…
The city’s May operations report, included in June 9 meeting materials, documents ongoing work but leaves the project’s cost, schedule and approval history unanswered.
A March 10 exchange put a safety concern near 426 Wade St. before town officials, but the timetable and scope of any road-related fix remain unsettled.
At a July meeting, the resident sought a refund or credit back to 2023 and questioned why the county needed private household-income information.