A Sept. 16 public hearing will determine whether the city moves ahead with its proposed land acquisition for water-system expansion; no vote or court filing has been documented.
Latest · awaiting the meeting record
- Latest
- An August 11 attorney notice to the current ownership again described a proposed condemnation for water-system expansion and set a September 1 hearing. Habersham News reports that hearing was rescheduled to September 16. The later city notice sets the new date but does not itself explain the schedule change.
- Next
- Awaiting the record of the Sep 16, 2026 meeting
Commissioners have approved a countywide agreement for a five-year 1% FLOST, but its promised millage relief depends first on the referendum and then on final calculations.
County Manager Tim Sims said the county’s LMIG work would be guided by road-condition ratings, but the Commission record does not document a paving vote…
The unanimous Aug. 17 vote clears the way for an intergovernmental agreement covering radio-system use and maintenance, though its public terms remain unknown.
The unanimous July vote replaces a 1992 development ordinance after months of debate over housing, rural land and the county’s ability to assess large projects.
The 5-0 July votes completed a process that began with a March Planning Commission hearing, though the public record provided does not establish when or how the new…
A redesign has removed major treatment components and left plans nearly complete, while the separate solar-dryer project remains on hold.
The referendum also continued a one-cent sales tax for six years, yet county records do not identify a bond sale, project list or timetable.
Commissioners voted unanimously to add recurring county-funded compensation for Sheriff Robin Krockum, while the public record leaves the payment’s budget treatment and start date unresolved.
A 2025 county vote documents a new agreement for county emergency services to provide fire protection in Demorest, while the precise operating terms are not fully visible in…
The unanimous May 12 action clears recommended 2026 applications, but county minutes do not identify the parcels or owners affected.
Commissioners were asked for direction on whether taxpayers should cover the added cost or county employees should contribute more; no final action is recorded.