A Sept. 16 public hearing will determine whether the city moves ahead with its proposed land acquisition for water-system expansion; no vote or court filing has been documented.
Latest · awaiting the meeting record
- Latest
- An August 11 attorney notice to the current ownership again described a proposed condemnation for water-system expansion and set a September 1 hearing. Habersham News reports that hearing was rescheduled to September 16. The later city notice sets the new date but does not itself explain the schedule change.
- Next
- Awaiting the record of the Sep 16, 2026 meeting
City commissioners placed the annual millage-rate decision on their Aug. 31 agenda, but the posted materials did not disclose a proposed rate or record final action.
Commissioners’ unanimous Aug. 20 action establishes the county rate for general purposes, while leaving parcel-by-parcel tax effects and the reason for the slight change unexplained.
The unanimous Aug. 17 vote clears the way for an intergovernmental agreement covering radio-system use and maintenance, though its public terms remain unknown.
Commissioners scheduled an Aug. 17 hearing on Mitchell Payne’s request to use a 5.58-acre Low Intensity parcel for go-kart and remote-control-car racing…
County commissioners selected Kimley-Horn for airport planning in June; August agendas put a master agreement before airport and county officials without documenting whether either body acted.
Commissioners placed a proposed Series 2026 general obligation bond resolution on their Aug. 17 agenda, but no official outcome record establishes whether it passed.
After a September public hearing drew support for commercial growth and warnings about traffic and sewer capacity, council members have yet to vote on bringing 45 acres into…
An Aug. 14 commission agenda listed a proposed rate of 9.956, equal to the stated rollback rate; no later official record in this matter establishes a vote or…
The advisory vote would allow a five-foot side setback on Tax Parcel 071E 042, while leaving the property’s residential use and allowed density unchanged.
The advisory recommendation would let two industrial parcels seek a 60-foot front setback instead of the usual 80 feet; a later final county action has not been identified.
Planning staff backed the requested change for Tax Parcel 028 019B, saying it would align adjoining land under one classification without adding homes or changing its current use.