Habersham County Weighs $1.04 Million Landfill Compactor Replacement
Commissioners discussed using SPLOST VIII money and a lease-purchase structure, but the April work session record shows no final action.
Current matters and research archive
Decided and dated matters first; the complete research directory when you need it.
Clarkesville124 current matters in the research directory
124 issuesResearch directory · Newest activity first
Commissioners discussed using SPLOST VIII money and a lease-purchase structure, but the April work session record shows no final action.
Commissioners discussed using a facility fund balance for replacement equipment at an April work session, but the record does not show a vote, approval or purchase.
Commissioners placed a proposed Frazer agreement on their April 20 agenda, but the public agenda does not show whether the work was authorized.
Airport commissioners were scheduled to review a plan that would retain AWOS while dropping land acquisition and apron repairs…
The Corporate Aircraft Association was waiting for Habersham County to approve its FY27 airport fee schedule before acting on an application, according to April meeting minutes.
A unanimous vote revived a request set aside in February, leaving the terms—and even the outcome—of any proposed service unresolved.
An April 9 county meeting record describes a planned presentation to state project managers, but it does not show a developer…
Commissioners put a higher county-funded supplement for June Black-Warren on their March 16 agenda, following a $6,000 annual supplement approved in 2022.
County commissioners publicly recognized an outside finance association’s fiscal 2026 honor on March 16; the meeting record shows no accompanying appropriation or policy change.
Commissioners discussed using a city-owned facility at 125 Ivy St. for fire operations, but the public meeting record does not show whether the agreement was approved.
County commissioners discussed gaining access to a 2022 pumper truck owned by Demorest, but the public meeting record does not show whether the proposed agreement moved forward.
The unanimous March 12 vote advances qualifying 2026 conservation-use applications, but the public record does not identify the parcels or show their later assessment treatment.