On April 28, 2026, the Board of Commissioners unanimously adopted a resolution updating the accessory structures provisions of the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance.
Stephens County planning commission ends tiny homes discussion, county later tightens accessory structure rules
Planning commissioners spent about a year weighing whether to allow tiny homes in the county before closing the discussion, and the county board has since adopted changes to accessory structure rules affecting residential lots.
April 28, 2026: Second and final reading and resolution adopting changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance
At a glance
What this means now
The story
In February 2025 the Stephens County Planning Commission began discussing whether to allow tiny homes in the county and directed staff to look into how other communities handle them. The discussion continued in March, when a commissioner suggested a called meeting or work session to work out what tiny homes would look like locally.
The commission held that called work session on April 1, 2025, and asked staff to research codes and the permitting process for tiny homes, with possible site visits to follow.
By January 2026 the Planning Commission had concluded its discussion of tiny homes. At the same meeting, members also took up separate ordinance matters, including changes for lakefront accessory structures and initial thoughts on a data center ordinance.
The county went on to update its land use ordinance on accessory structures. The Planning Commission recommended cutting the maximum accessory structure height in RS Districts from 50 feet to 25 feet, and the Board of Commissioners held a public hearing and first reading on the broader ordinance changes, which also included a limit of no more than three accessory buildings on any RS-zoned lot.
On April 28, 2026, the Board of Commissioners unanimously adopted a resolution updating the accessory structures provisions of the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance.
What happened
How this issue got here
Open any step for its supporting record. A proposal remains labeled as proposed until later evidence establishes an outcome.
ApprovedunknownResolution adopting updates to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance's accessory structures provisions
Motion to adopt resolution for updates to accessory structures ordinance: Commissioner
Simmons
Second: Commissioner Wright
Vote: Unanimous
+
Resolution adopting updates to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance's accessory structures provisions
Motion to adopt resolution for updates to accessory structures ordinance: Commissioner Simmons Second: Commissioner Wright Vote: Unanimous
ApprovedconfirmedResolution adopting changes to Stephens County Land Use Ordinance (accessory structures)
Motion to adopt resolution for updates to accessory structures ordinance: Commissioner
Simmons
+
Resolution adopting changes to Stephens County Land Use Ordinance (accessory structures)
Motion to adopt resolution for updates to accessory structures ordinance: Commissioner Simmons
Appeared on agendaproposedSecond and final reading and resolution adopting changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance
Second and final reading for the proposed changes to the Stephens County land Use Ordinance.
+
Second and final reading and resolution adopting changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance
Second and final reading for the proposed changes to the Stephens County land Use Ordinance.
DiscusseddiscussedUpdate to land use ordinance concerning accessory structures, public hearing scheduled for April 14
the land use
ordinance concerning accessory structures has been updated with a public hearing scheduled for
April 14
+
Update to land use ordinance concerning accessory structures, public hearing scheduled for April 14
the land use ordinance concerning accessory structures has been updated with a public hearing scheduled for April 14
Appeared on agendaproposedProposed changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance (first reading/public hearing)
First reading and public hearing for proposed changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance.
+
Proposed changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance (first reading/public hearing)
First reading and public hearing for proposed changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance.
DiscusseddiscussedProposed changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance (first reading/public hearing)
First reading and public hearing for proposed changes to the Stephens County Land Use
Ordinance.
+
Proposed changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance (first reading/public hearing)
First reading and public hearing for proposed changes to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance.
Appeared on agendaproposedAmendment to Sec. 59-1610, Accessory Buildings and Uses (Land Development Code)
No more than three accessory buildings shall be permitted on any lot zoned Residential Single (RS),
+
Amendment to Sec. 59-1610, Accessory Buildings and Uses (Land Development Code)
No more than three accessory buildings shall be permitted on any lot zoned Residential Single (RS),
ApprovedunknownAmendment to Land Use Ordinance reducing maximum accessory structure height in RS Districts from 50 feet to 25 feet
Motion to recommend Approval of Accessory Structure Ordinance: Vice-Chairman Ivester
Second: Commissioner Cobb
Discussion: No discussion
Vote: Unanimous
+
Amendment to Land Use Ordinance reducing maximum accessory structure height in RS Districts from 50 feet to 25 feet
Motion to recommend Approval of Accessory Structure Ordinance: Vice-Chairman Ivester Second: Commissioner Cobb Discussion: No discussion Vote: Unanimous
Appeared on agendaproposedProposed amendment to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance
Consideration of a proposed amendment to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance.
+
Proposed amendment to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance
Consideration of a proposed amendment to the Stephens County Land Use Ordinance.
ApprovedconfirmedAmendment to Stephens County Land Use Ordinance - accessory structure height limit in RS Districts
a request was made to reduce the proposed maximum accessory structure
height in RS Districts, from 50 feet to 25 feet
+
Amendment to Stephens County Land Use Ordinance - accessory structure height limit in RS Districts
a request was made to reduce the proposed maximum accessory structure height in RS Districts, from 50 feet to 25 feet
DiscusseddiscussedUpdate to land use ordinance concerning accessory structures, with public hearing scheduled for April 14
the land use ordinance concerning accessory structures has been updated with a public hearing scheduled for
April 14
+
Update to land use ordinance concerning accessory structures, with public hearing scheduled for April 14
the land use ordinance concerning accessory structures has been updated with a public hearing scheduled for April 14
DiscusseddiscussedDiscussion of ordinance changes for lakefront accessory structures, a data center ordinance, and tiny homes
Planning Commission Members discussed ordinance changes regarding accessory structures for
lakefront properties, initial thoughts on the adoption and placement of a data center ordinance,
and the conclusion of commission discussion on tiny homes.
+
Discussion of ordinance changes for lakefront accessory structures, a data center ordinance, and tiny homes
Planning Commission Members discussed ordinance changes regarding accessory structures for lakefront properties, initial thoughts on the adoption and placement of a data center ordinance, and the conclusion of commission discussion on tiny homes.
DiscusseddiscussedDiscussion of proposed ordinance changes: lakefront accessory structures, a data center ordinance, and tiny homes
Planning Commission Members discussed ordinance changes regarding accessory structures for
lakefront properties, initial thoughts on the adoption and placement of a data center ordinance,
and the conclusion of commission discussion on tiny homes.
+
Discussion of proposed ordinance changes: lakefront accessory structures, a data center ordinance, and tiny homes
Planning Commission Members discussed ordinance changes regarding accessory structures for lakefront properties, initial thoughts on the adoption and placement of a data center ordinance, and the conclusion of commission discussion on tiny homes.
Appeared on agendaproposedOrdinance discussion
5. Ordinance Discussion.
+
Ordinance discussion
5. Ordinance Discussion.
Appeared on agendaproposedDiscussion on tiny homes
Discussion on tiny homes.
+
Discussion on tiny homes
Discussion on tiny homes.
DiscusseddiscussedDiscussion on tiny homes: codes and permitting
The Planning Commission requested staff to research codes and permitting process for tiny homes and potentially schedule additional site visits for discussion purposes.
+
Discussion on tiny homes: codes and permitting
The Planning Commission requested staff to research codes and permitting process for tiny homes and potentially schedule additional site visits for discussion purposes.
DiscusseddiscussedDiscussion on tiny homes regulations and permitting
The Planning Commission requested staff to research codes and permitting process for tiny homes and potentially schedule additional site visits for discussion purposes.
+
Discussion on tiny homes regulations and permitting
The Planning Commission requested staff to research codes and permitting process for tiny homes and potentially schedule additional site visits for discussion purposes.
DiscusseddiscussedDiscussion on tiny homes and potential county regulations
Mr. Hamilton suggested a called meeting/work session to discuss tiny homes and what they wouid
look like in our county.
+
Discussion on tiny homes and potential county regulations
Mr. Hamilton suggested a called meeting/work session to discuss tiny homes and what they wouid look like in our county.
Appeared on agendaproposedDiscussion of tiny homes policy (Old Business)
Discussion on tiny homes.
+
Discussion of tiny homes policy (Old Business)
Discussion on tiny homes.
DiscusseddiscussedDiscussion on tiny homes and potential called meeting/work session
Mr. Hamilton suggested a called meeting/work session to discuss tiny homes and what they would
look like in our county.
+
Discussion on tiny homes and potential called meeting/work session
Mr. Hamilton suggested a called meeting/work session to discuss tiny homes and what they would look like in our county.
Showing 1–20 of 23 recorded steps.
Find a step on another page
These links also preserve bookmarks to earlier timeline steps.
Research the record