The cited official record ends with the April 1, 2025 entry and does not establish a later final outcome.
Habersham storage owner seeks to undo Rockford Creek Road access restriction
Omega Properties wants direct access for the upper portion of a 16.64-acre RV, boat and self-storage tract, but county records do not show a recommendation or final decision.
At a glance
What this means now
The story
Omega Properties & Development LLC asked the Habersham County Planning Commission on April 1, 2025, to remove a condition that prevents direct driveway access from its storage property at Rockford Creek and Hollywood Hills roads to Rockford Creek Road. The commission discussed the request, identified as Z-25-01, but its minutes do not record a recommendation on whether the restriction should be lifted.
The dispute concerns more than the placement of a driveway. The restriction governs how the upper portion of a 16.64-acre tract approved for RV, boat and self-storage may connect to nearby roads. Removing it could allow a direct Rockford Creek Road entrance and alter the access arrangement that accompanied the property’s earlier zoning approval, with consequences for the site’s layout and future use.
Omega’s original request was placed on the Planning Commission’s Oct. 5, 2021 agenda to rezone Map 128 Parcel 061C from LI to HI for RV storage. Later that month, on Oct. 18, Board of Commissioners minutes record a unanimous approval for RV, boat and self-storage use. That approval required the driveway to remain on the Hollywood Hills Road side, required a 25-foot undisturbed buffer along Rockford Creek Road, and limited the tract to storage use. The 2025 application seeks to remove the driveway condition created by that earlier decision.
Omega Properties is the only party whose position is described in the Planning Commission minutes. According to those minutes, the applicant said it wanted to sell an approximately 2.2-acre upper portion of the tract to a buyer who lives across Rockford Creek Road, and sought removal of the direct-access restriction. The county’s 2021 Board of Commissioners action, by contrast, established the Hollywood Hills Road-only driveway condition as part of its approval. The record supplied here does not document comments from neighbors, the prospective buyer, or county staff explaining a position on the 2025 request.
The 2021 rezoning and its listed conditions were completed county actions; the current access change is only a request discussed by the Planning Commission. The April 2025 minutes do not show that the commission endorsed or rejected Z-25-01, and they do not establish a later Board of Commissioners decision. A duplicate record also describes the 2021 approval, but its source label gives only “10.18” and does not establish a year; the separate Board minutes identify the approval date as Oct. 18, 2021.
No later public hearing, Planning Commission recommendation or Board of Commissioners action is documented after the April 1, 2025 discussion. The next concrete public development would be a new Planning Commission record or Board action on Z-25-01. Until then, it remains undecided whether Omega can create direct Rockford Creek Road access for the upper portion of the tract and whether the county would retain, remove or replace any access conditions.
Arguments in the record
Positions presented publicly
The applicant said it sought removal of the restriction in connection with a proposed sale of an approximately 2.2-acre upper portion to a buyer living across Rockford Creek Road.
The 2021 Board of Commissioners approval placed the driveway on the Hollywood Hills Road side, but the 2025 Planning Commission minutes do not document a county recommendation or final ruling on changing that condition.
What happened
How this issue got here
Open any step for its supporting record. A proposal remains labeled as proposed until later evidence establishes an outcome.
DiscusseddiscussedPlanning Commission considers request to remove Rockford Creek access restriction
On April 1, 2025, the Planning Commission considered Omega Properties & Development’s request to remove the condition barring direct driveway access to Rockford Creek Road. The applicant said it sought to sell an approximately 2.2-acre upper portion to a buyer living across that road.
+
Planning Commission considers request to remove Rockford Creek access restriction
On April 1, 2025, the Planning Commission considered Omega Properties & Development’s request to remove the condition barring direct driveway access to Rockford Creek Road. The applicant said it sought to sell an approximately 2.2-acre upper portion to a buyer living across that road.
ApprovedconfirmedCounty approves RV-storage rezoning with Rockford Creek access restriction
On October 18, 2021, the Board of Commissioners unanimously approved rezoning the 16.64-acre tract for RV/boat and self-storage, requiring the driveway to remain on the Hollywood Hills Road side, a 25-foot undisturbed Rockford Creek Road buffer, and storage-only use.
+
County approves RV-storage rezoning with Rockford Creek access restriction
On October 18, 2021, the Board of Commissioners unanimously approved rezoning the 16.64-acre tract for RV/boat and self-storage, requiring the driveway to remain on the Hollywood Hills Road side, a 25-foot undisturbed Rockford Creek Road buffer, and storage-only use.
Appeared on agendaproposedPlanning Commission schedules RV-storage rezoning request
The October 5, 2021 Planning Commission agenda scheduled Omega Properties & Development’s request to rezone Map 128 Parcel 061C from LI to HI for RV storage at Rockford Creek and Hollywood Hills roads.
+
Planning Commission schedules RV-storage rezoning request
The October 5, 2021 Planning Commission agenda scheduled Omega Properties & Development’s request to rezone Map 128 Parcel 061C from LI to HI for RV storage at Rockford Creek and Hollywood Hills roads.
Still unresolved
What is not yet known
These are evidence gaps, not assumptions. They remain open until a dependable source closes them.
- The April 2025 Planning Commission minutes document discussion but not a recommendation or final outcome on the access request.
- No later public hearing date or Board of Commissioners action is documented.
- A duplicate 2021 approval record lacks a confirmed year; separate Board of Commissioners minutes date the approval to October 18, 2021.
Research the record