The by-laws were back on the authority's agenda for review and adoption at its October 8 meeting.
IssueHabersham Countyunder consideration
Development Authority amends by-laws, then returns to review them again
The authority's governing rules, never formally adopted, were revised and approved this summer but came back up for review again in October.
Latest
October 8, 2026: Review and adoption of Development Authority by-laws
What happens next
No next step has been documented.
At a glance
What this means now
The story
At a May 2026 meeting, the Habersham County Development Authority noted that its by-laws had been revised before but never formally adopted.
The authority's July 16 agenda listed a review and adoption of the by-laws.
At that July 16 meeting, the authority voted 5-0 on a motion by Jeff Bruns, seconded by Bryan Ferguson, to approve the revised by-laws, with an amendment for Matt to make changes clarifying the absence policy and referencing the authority's original enabling legislation.
The by-laws were back on the authority's agenda for review and adoption at its October 8 meeting.
What happened
How this issue got here
Open any step for its supporting record. A proposal remains labeled as proposed until later evidence establishes an outcome.
Appeared on agendaproposedReview and adoption of Development Authority by-laws
Review/Adopt By-Laws
+
Review and adoption of Development Authority by-laws
Review/Adopt By-Laws
Appeared on agendaproposedReview and adoption of Development Authority By-Laws
Review/Adopt By-Laws
+
Review and adoption of Development Authority By-Laws
Review/Adopt By-Laws
AmendedconfirmedRevised Development Authority By-Laws
A MOTION was made by Jeff
Bruns, seconded by Bryan Ferguson, and voted 5-0 to approve the revised by-laws with a
specific amendment that Matt will make changes to clarify the absence policy and reference
the original enabling legislation of the Development Authority.
+
Revised Development Authority By-Laws
A MOTION was made by Jeff Bruns, seconded by Bryan Ferguson, and voted 5-0 to approve the revised by-laws with a specific amendment that Matt will make changes to clarify the absence policy and reference the original enabling legislation of the Development Authority.
DiscusseddiscussedDiscussion of Development Authority by-laws, never formally adopted
The HCDA by-laws were previously revised, but they were
+
Discussion of Development Authority by-laws, never formally adopted
The HCDA by-laws were previously revised, but they were
Research the record