The RFP award and the authorization to negotiate are completed county actions. A final operating agreement, however, remains a proposal to be negotiated, not an established transfer. The Dec. 3 minutes do not say that a contract was executed, that the gymnastics operation changed hands or that the lease for the current facility was transferred; the timing and terms of any implementation therefore remain unknown.
Split Habersham vote advances plan to privatize county gymnastics program
Commissioners selected the sole bidder and opened negotiations, but no public record tied to the proceeding establishes a final operating agreement or lease transfer.
At a glance
What this means now
The story
Habersham County commissioners voted 3-2 on Dec. 3, 2024, to award RFP 2025-06, a solicitation intended to privatize the county gymnastics program, and authorized staff to negotiate with Neva Daniels, owner of North Georgia Reign Gymnastics. Commissioners Tench and Palmer dissented. The vote advances a possible transfer of operations but did not itself put a private operator in charge.
The decision matters because it could move responsibility for a county-run recreation program—and the leased space where it operates—from county government to a private business. With only one proposal submitted, the eventual negotiated terms would determine such practical questions as who operates the program, how the facility lease is handled and when any transition could occur.
Before the vote, the commission had directed that an RFP be sought for privatizing the gymnastics program. That process produced one proposal, from North Georgia Reign Gymnastics. When the item returned to commissioners on Dec. 3, they chose to award the solicitation and let county staff begin negotiating a final agreement rather than resolving the operating and lease details in the vote itself.
Daniels and North Georgia Reign Gymnastics were the sole respondents to the county’s request and were selected for negotiations. The commission’s division was explicit: Tench and Palmer voted against the motion, while three commissioners supported it. The minutes also record a question over whether Tench’s participation in the program required recusal; the county attorney advised that it was not a viable conflict requiring him to step aside.
The RFP award and the authorization to negotiate are completed county actions. A final operating agreement, however, remains a proposal to be negotiated, not an established transfer. The Dec. 3 minutes do not say that a contract was executed, that the gymnastics operation changed hands or that the lease for the current facility was transferred; the timing and terms of any implementation therefore remain unknown.
The next public indication of progress would be a county commission agenda item, executed contract or another county record that sets out the negotiated arrangement. Until then, residents cannot determine from this proceeding’s record whether the private transition will occur, how the lease would change hands or when North Georgia Reign Gymnastics might begin operating the program.
Arguments in the record
Positions presented publicly
Three commissioners supported awarding the RFP and authorizing negotiations with North Georgia Reign Gymnastics.
Commissioners Tench and Palmer dissented from the motion to award the RFP and authorize negotiations.
The county attorney advised that Tench’s participation in the program did not present a viable conflict requiring recusal.
What happened
How this issue got here
Open any step for its supporting record. A proposal remains labeled as proposed until later evidence establishes an outcome.
ApprovedconfirmedCommission awards gymnastics privatization RFP
On December 3, 2024, the commission voted 3–2 to award RFP 2025-06 for privatizing the gymnastics program and authorized staff to negotiate a final agreement; Commissioners Tench and Palmer dissented.
+
Commission awards gymnastics privatization RFP
On December 3, 2024, the commission voted 3–2 to award RFP 2025-06 for privatizing the gymnastics program and authorized staff to negotiate a final agreement; Commissioners Tench and Palmer dissented.
DiscussedconfirmedCounty attorney addresses recusal question
During the December 3, 2024 discussion, the county attorney advised that Commissioner Tench’s participation in the program was not a viable conflict requiring recusal from the vote.
+
County attorney addresses recusal question
During the December 3, 2024 discussion, the county attorney advised that Commissioner Tench’s participation in the program was not a viable conflict requiring recusal from the vote.
Still unresolved
What is not yet known
These are evidence gaps, not assumptions. They remain open until a dependable source closes them.
- The Dec. 3, 2024, minutes authorize negotiations but do not establish that a final agreement was executed.
Newsroom notes1 open check on the record
How the newsroom is still working this matter. These are process notes, not reported facts.
- openThe retained records do not establish the final outcomeLocate later official minutes, resolutions, contracts, payments, or implementation records that resolve the matter.
Research the record