The request is listed on Franklin County Board of Commissioners agendas dated October 5, 2026, as a proposed item. No Board vote is recorded yet.
Franklin County weighs variance to split 889 Varner Road into two lots
If approved, the variance would let a roughly 23-acre parcel on Varner Road be divided into two lots despite the county's minimum frontage rule.
Franklin County Board of Commissioners agenda item dated October 5, 2026.
At a glance
What this means now
The story
David Cook has applied for a variance from the minimum lot frontage rule in Unified Development Code Sec. 1-201 for 889 Varner Road in Carnesville. The property, owned by Willis H. and Carolyn A. Cook, is about 23.22 acres. The request is to create two lots without meeting the 60-foot minimum road frontage.
A county agenda item states that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance by a 5-0 vote. The record does not show a Planning Commission vote in the event data beyond that statement.
The request is listed on Franklin County Board of Commissioners agendas dated October 5, 2026, as a proposed item. No Board vote is recorded yet.
Scheduled
What is on the calendar
Dated steps the official record has already set. They move into the timeline below once they happen.
Appeared on agendaproposedVariance from minimum lot frontage rule to create two lots at 889 Varner Rd, Carnesville (applicant David Cook; owners Willis H. & Carolyn A. Cook)
Planning Commission recommended approval 5-0
+
Variance from minimum lot frontage rule to create two lots at 889 Varner Rd, Carnesville (applicant David Cook; owners Willis H. & Carolyn A. Cook)
Planning Commission recommended approval 5-0
Appeared on agendaproposedVariance to Unified Development Code Sec. 1-201 minimum lot frontage to create two lots at 889 Varner Rd, Carnesville, applicant David Cook
To create two lots without meeting the minimum 60
+
Variance to Unified Development Code Sec. 1-201 minimum lot frontage to create two lots at 889 Varner Rd, Carnesville, applicant David Cook
To create two lots without meeting the minimum 60
What happened
How this issue got here
Open any step for its supporting record. A proposal remains labeled as proposed until later evidence establishes an outcome.
Research the record