NEGAbriefLocal records made useful
IssueDemorestapproved

Demorest Drops Proposed Tax Increase, Adopts 6.593-Mill Rollback Rate

The unanimous Oct. 30 vote replaced a tentative 7.16-mill rate that city notices said would have raised property taxes 8.60%.

By NEGA Brief NewsroomLast checked October 30, 2025
What happens next

Council’s rate vote is complete. The next public follow-through is implementation through the city’s tax process and any later city record or resolution reflecting the enacted 2025 millage rate; the records reviewed end with the Oct. 30 action, so those steps and individual bills are not yet established here. One record also contains a clerical inconsistency: Oct. 21 hearing minutes refer to a next hearing on Oct. 6, while the city notice and Oct. 30 agenda identify Oct. 30 as the later hearing date documented by the final vote.

At a glance

What this means now

Where it stands

The 7.16-mill figure was a tentative proposal, not the enacted 2025 rate. The completed council action is the Oct. 30 approval of 6.593 mills. The city’s earlier estimates described the higher proposal’s effect, not a property-by-property calculation under the adopted rate; an owner’s final tax bill will still depend on assessed value and other tax-bill factors.

The story

Demorest City Council unanimously adopted a 6.593-mill property-tax rate for 2025 at its Oct. 30 special called meeting, abandoning the higher 7.16-mill rate it had previously advanced tentatively. Councilman Allen made the motion, Councilman Davis seconded it, and the four members present approved it 4–0 after a public hearing at which no one spoke.

SourcesCity Council Minutes — 10.30.25 Special Called Meeting Minutes FINAL.pdf

The rate helps determine city property-tax bills, making the change consequential for homeowners and other property owners. City notices described 6.593 mills as the rollback rate; the earlier 7.16-mill proposal was 0.567 mills higher and was projected to increase property taxes 8.60%, including an estimated $28.35 more on a $175,000 homestead property and $39.69 more on a similarly valued nonhomestead property.

SourcesCity Council Notice — SC BUDGET MILLAGE NOTICE10-7 10-21 10-30.pdf

The city first publicly noticed that council had tentatively adopted the 7.16-mill rate, though the notice does not specify when that tentative action occurred. The proposal then moved through hearings: Mayor Harkness opened an Oct. 21 public hearing on the 7.16-mill figure, with no comments recorded. By the Oct. 30 hearing, council agreed on Budget 4 Option 1 and its 6.593-mill rollback rate, setting up the final vote later in that meeting.

SourcesCity Council Notice — SC BUDGET MILLAGE NOTICE10-7 10-21 10-30.pdfCity Council Minutes — 10.21.25 SC PH Millage and Budget Minutes FINAL.pdfCity Council Minutes — 10.30.25 Special Called Meeting Minutes FINAL.pdf

The city’s notices framed the earlier 7.16-mill proposal as a rate above rollback and quantified its projected effect on homestead and nonhomestead properties. At both documented hearings, the minutes record no public comments, so they do not identify organized support for or opposition to either rate. Council’s final position was unanimous: the members present chose the rollback-rate option rather than the tentatively proposed increase.

SourcesCity Council Notice — SC BUDGET MILLAGE NOTICE10-7 10-21 10-30.pdfCity Council Minutes — 10.21.25 SC PH Millage and Budget Minutes FINAL.pdfCity Council Minutes — 10.30.25 Special Called Meeting Minutes FINAL.pdf

The 7.16-mill figure was a tentative proposal, not the enacted 2025 rate. The completed council action is the Oct. 30 approval of 6.593 mills. The city’s earlier estimates described the higher proposal’s effect, not a property-by-property calculation under the adopted rate; an owner’s final tax bill will still depend on assessed value and other tax-bill factors.

SourcesCity Council Notice — SC BUDGET MILLAGE NOTICE10-7 10-21 10-30.pdfCity Council Minutes — 10.30.25 Special Called Meeting Minutes FINAL.pdf

Council’s rate vote is complete. The next public follow-through is implementation through the city’s tax process and any later city record or resolution reflecting the enacted 2025 millage rate; the records reviewed end with the Oct. 30 action, so those steps and individual bills are not yet established here. One record also contains a clerical inconsistency: Oct. 21 hearing minutes refer to a next hearing on Oct. 6, while the city notice and Oct. 30 agenda identify Oct. 30 as the later hearing date documented by the final vote.

SourcesCity Council Minutes — 10.30.25 Special Called Meeting Minutes FINAL.pdfCity Council Minutes — 10.21.25 SC PH Millage and Budget Minutes FINAL.pdf

Arguments in the record

Positions presented publicly

Council’s final action

Council unanimously approved the 6.593-mill rollback rate at the Oct. 30 special called meeting.

Public hearing record

The minutes record no public comments at the Oct. 21 and Oct. 30 millage-rate hearings.

What happened

How this issue got here

Open any step for its supporting record. A proposal remains labeled as proposed until later evidence establishes an outcome.

Amended
confirmed

Council agrees on 6.593-mill rollback rate

At the October 30 public hearing, council agreed on Budget 4 Option 1's 6.593-mill rollback rate instead of the earlier tentative 7.16-mill rate. No one spoke at the hearing.

Approved
confirmed

Council unanimously approves 6.593-mill 2025 rate

Councilman Allen moved to approve the 6.593-mill 2025 rate, Councilman Davis seconded, and the council unanimously approved it 4–0.

Discussed
discussed

Council holds October 21 millage-rate hearing

Mayor Harkness opened the October 21 public hearing on the tentative 7.16-mill rate; the minutes say no comments were made.

Appeared on agenda
proposed

Council tentatively adopts a 7.16-mill rate

A public notice says the council tentatively adopted a 7.16-mill rate, 0.567 mills above the 6.593-mill rollback rate, projected to increase property taxes 8.60%.

Still unresolved

What is not yet known

These are evidence gaps, not assumptions. They remain open until a dependable source closes them.

  1. The city notice does not state the date on which council tentatively adopted the 7.16-mill proposal.
  2. The Oct. 21 hearing minutes identify the next hearing as Oct. 6, 2025, a date that conflicts with the notice and Oct. 30 agenda identifying Oct. 30.

Research the record

Search the underlying agendas, minutes, and documents.

Search supporting records