NEGAbriefLocal records made useful
Historical recordCorneliaarchived · outcome not found

Hazel Creek gauge work remains on hold as Cornelia weighs possible 4.5 MGD withdrawal

A Water Authority agenda links a planned C&S application to recalibration of the creek’s stream gauge, but it does not show that the work, application or withdrawal moved forward.

By NEGA Brief Newsroom

The story

Cornelia’s Water Authority reported in its April 26, 2022, agenda that calibration of the stream gauge at Hazel Creek remained on hold, even as the agenda described an earlier January conference call in which Nutter & Associates was authorized to proceed with the work. The same agenda said C&S planned to apply for permission to withdraw up to 4.5 million gallons a day from Hazel Creek, tying the stalled gauge work to a potentially significant new demand on the creek.

SourcesWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KBWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KB

The question is not simply whether a gauge is repaired or recalibrated. The agenda anticipated that a withdrawal request of that size would require a 70.10 analysis and recalibration of the gauge, making stream-flow information part of the factual groundwork for any later decision about water use. But the agenda does not establish that C&S had permission to take water, that Hazel Creek could support the proposed withdrawal, or that any regulator had resolved the application.

SourcesWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KBWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KB

According to the Water Authority agenda, the sequence began with an undated January conference call that authorized Nutter & Associates to proceed with gauge calibration. C&S’s planned request to withdraw as much as 4.5 MGD was expected to trigger the flow analysis and recalibration described in the agenda. By the April 26 meeting, however, the agenda characterized the calibration as on hold, indicating that the proposed next steps had not yet produced a documented completed gauge project or withdrawal decision.

SourcesWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KBWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KB

C&S was identified in the agenda as the party planning to seek withdrawal permission, while Nutter & Associates was identified as the consultant authorized to handle gauge calibration. The Water Authority’s agenda presents the calibration and analysis as work connected to the anticipated request. It does not provide a statement from C&S, identify a regulator’s position, or record comments from creek users, nearby residents or environmental groups; nor does it say what the consultant found.

SourcesWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KBWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KB

The documented facts are limited: the agenda reports that authorization was given during a January conference call, says calibration was on hold in April, and says C&S planned to apply for a withdrawal of up to 4.5 MGD. The January call has no exact date or year in the agenda text, and the agenda does not identify a governing-body vote or final approval. It also does not show that calibration was completed, report its cost or results, confirm that an application was filed, or establish that any Hazel Creek water was withdrawn.

SourcesWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KBWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KB

The next public step would be a later Water Authority agenda or minutes, a gauge report, or an official withdrawal application that shows whether the proposal advanced beyond the April 2022 status report. Until one of those records documents completion, filing or regulatory action, residents cannot determine whether the gauge was recalibrated, whether C&S formally sought the 4.5 MGD withdrawal, or how any analysis affected Hazel Creek decisions.

SourcesWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KBWater Authority Agenda for April 26, 2022 175.9 KB

Arguments in the record

Positions presented publicly

Water Authority agenda

The agenda says gauge calibration was on hold while reporting earlier authorization for Nutter & Associates to proceed and C&S’s plan to seek a withdrawal of up to 4.5 MGD.

C&S proposal

C&S is described as planning to apply for withdrawal permission; the record does not confirm that it filed an application or state its rationale.

What happened

How this issue got here

Open any step for its supporting record. A proposal remains labeled as proposed until later evidence establishes an outcome.

Complete record history1 additional official mention

These records help verify the history but do not establish a new decision or project state.

mentioned
unknown

Agenda reports Hazel Creek gauge work remains on hold

The April 2022 Water Authority agenda said Hazel Creek stream-gauge calibration was on hold, while describing an undated January conference call to authorize Nutter & Associates to proceed. It also said C&S planned to apply to withdraw 4.5 MGD from Hazel Creek, a step expected to trigger a 70.10 analysis and gauge recalibration.

Still unresolved

What is not yet known

These are evidence gaps, not assumptions. They remain open until a dependable source closes them.

  1. The agenda does not give the January conference call an exact date or year.
  2. The agenda reports authorization but does not identify a governing-body vote or final approval.
  3. No record here establishes completed calibration, a filed or approved withdrawal application, analysis results, or an actual withdrawal from Hazel Creek.
Newsroom notes1 open check on the record

How the newsroom is still working this matter. These are process notes, not reported facts.

Research the record

Search the underlying agendas, minutes, and documents.

Search supporting records