Subject
Zoning and land use
1,592 collected facts are classified here under Development.
Issues
49–60 of 150
Royston approves residential rezoning for Winn Street parcel eyed for duplexesapprovedRoyston approves entertainment districts, but downtown footprint remains unclearapprovedRoyston advances annexation tied to 1070 Franklin Springs Street rezoning requestapprovedRoyston advances Highway 17 North annexation with 36-home capapprovedRoyston Raises Certain Planning and Zoning Application Fees to $325approvedRoyston Has Yet to Record a Decision on Request for Four More Breanna Way TownhomesapprovedRoyston Closes Baker Street Rezoning Hearing Without Recording a Final DecisionapprovedRock Creek Road setback request remains unresolved after county agendasawaiting decisionPonderosa Road racing-track proposal still lacks documented county decisionawaiting decisionOpposite rezoning requests leave Highway 320 tract’s status unresolvedawaiting decisionOld Mize Road rezoning remains unresolved after returning to Stephens County agendaawaiting decisionOakbrook Trail rezoning advanced, but Stephens County’s final action is still unknownawaiting decision
Meaningful Changes
9–16 of 722
The Aug. 17, 2026 Board of Commissioners agenda listed Resolution 2026-08-001 to accept In and Out Home Buyers, LLC’s request to deannex 4.122 acres, Parcel 108 031D, from Demorest.Historical recordThe August 17 county commission agenda scheduled discussion of Cook Construction and Real Estate’s application to annex 45 acres into Baldwin, covering parcels 050 002C, 050 047B, 048 022, 048 022A and 048 023. The agenda does not itself establish an action on that discussion.Historical recordThe Habersham County Board of Commissioners agenda scheduled a public hearing for Aug. 17, 2026, on Mitchell Payne’s request to conditionally use 5.58 acres at 155 Ponderosa Road for go-kart and remote-control-car activity.Historical recordIn Stephens County Government's official recording of the August 4, 2026 meeting, “Planning Commission considered industrial setback reduction” is taken up at about 7:43; a motion and vote are heard, and at about 9:10 the body votes to recommend approval. The machine transcript reads “All in favor say I.” This outcome comes from the machine transcript of the recording; it will be replaced by the official minutes when they are published.Historical recordIn Stephens County Government's official recording of the August 4, 2026 meeting, “Planning Commission to consider side-setback variance” is taken up at about 9:10; a motion and vote are heard, and at about 10:46 the body votes to recommend approval. The machine transcript reads “Motion carries.” This outcome comes from the machine transcript of the recording; it will be replaced by the official minutes when they are published.Historical recordThe August 4, 2026 agenda put before the Planning Commission a request to reduce one side setback for Tax Parcel 071E 042 from 10 feet to 5 feet. The Planning Department recommended approval and said the request would not change permitted residential use or RS-district density.Historical recordOn August 4, 2026, the Planning Commission was scheduled to consider rezoning Tax Parcel 028 019B from RS (Residential Single Family) to AI (Agricultural Intensive). Staff recommended approval, describing the request as an administrative step to combine adjoining parcels under one classification; it would not increase residential density or change the existing property use.Historical recordThe August 4, 2026 Planning Commission agenda placed before the body a request to reduce the required front setback from 80 feet to 60 feet for Tax Parcels 053045 and 053044. Planning staff recommended approval, citing the industrial setting and consistency with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance.Historical record
Research