subject in Mount Airy
Taxes and fees
16 related issues are currently assembled for this area.
Issues
1–12 of 16
Habersham’s 2026 Tax-Levy Decision Remains Unclear After Scheduled Hearingawaiting decisionHabersham weighed firework-related Fire Department fees, but outcome remains unclearawaiting decisionHabersham voters face sales-tax-for-property-tax swap in Novemberon ballotHabersham recreation fee review stays tabled, leaving residents’ potential costs unknownon holdHabersham board considers lower fairgrounds charges for setup and teardownunder considerationHabersham assessors close the door on late 2025 tax appealsapprovedHabersham assessors clear recommended CUVA applications for small propertiesapprovedHabersham assessors clear faster route for some tax-bill correctionsapprovedHabersham assessors approve conservation-use tax applications for smaller propertiesapprovedHabersham airport rent debate leaves revenue plan unsettledunder considerationHabersham airport panel weighs hangar-rent increase of at least 25%under considerationHabersham Hangar Wait-List Fee Remains Undecided After County Discussionunder consideration
Meaningful Changes
25–32 of 123
The Board of Commissioners unanimously approved, 5-0, the SPLOST VIII (2026) intergovernmental agreement with Alto, Baldwin, Clarkesville, Cornelia, Demorest, Mount Airy, and Tallulah Falls.Historical recordOn July 21, the commission voted 4-1 to approve the county SPLOST VIII project list for drafting an intergovernmental agreement. Officials described it as a continuation of the current 1% sales tax, with projects focused largely on public safety.Historical recordAt its July 21, 2025 work session, the county considered focusing first on renewing its existing SPLOST before asking voters about an additional 1% FLOST. County Manager Sims said revenue projections used a 15-year lookback.Historical recordAt its July 21 work session, the commission discussed proposed SPLOST VIII priorities including public safety, jail needs and road resurfacing capacity.Historical recordOfficials said city project lists had to be finalized and the intergovernmental agreement approved before the commission could vote on the agreement and a referendum resolution, requiring a special called meeting.Historical recordOn June 30, 2025, the Habersham County Commission approved Resolution 2025-06-004 amending the FY 2026 fee schedule, 4-1. Commissioner Harkness dissented.Historical recordOn June 16, 2025, the county manager told commissioners the tax digest had not arrived because of Tax Assessors Office data-conversion issues with WinGap and state programming problems related to House Bill 581. He said staff were seeking cuts to stay within estimated revenue; the general fund was about 4% higher while the total budget across funds was down $4 million.Historical recordOn June 10, 2025, staff provided the Board of Assessors with Family Promise of White County’s Tax Year 2025 exempt-property application for parcel 040-157 and recommended denial. The excerpt does not record a board decision.Historical record
Research